Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 67
Filtrar
5.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37462108

RESUMO

Summary: Anaphylaxis is a potentially fatal hypersensitivity reaction but frequently underrecognized. Although its incidence rates vary according to geographical location, it seems clear that there has been a general increase in recent years, either because of greater recognition of this entity or because it is progressing proportionally to the presence of allergic diseases in the world. The development of anaphylaxis management guidelines adapted to local or regional needs seems of utmost importance. Furthermore, it is necessary to assess their implementation and their positive effect regarding diagnosing and treating anaphylaxis. In this review we explore the currently existing definitions of anaphylaxis and its epidemiology, the potential triggers of anaphylaxis and guideline recommendations in terms of diagnosis and management, proposing a novel anaphylaxis calculator and reviewing the current scoring methods for anaphylactic episodes.

9.
J. investig. allergol. clin. immunol ; 33(1): 30-38, 2023. graf, tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-216401

RESUMO

Objective: The objective of the present study was to determine the use of systemic corticosteroids (SCs) in patients with bronchial asthma using big data analysis. Methods: We performed an observational, retrospective, noninterventional study based on secondary data captured from free text in the electronic health records. This study was performed based on data from the regional health service of Castille-La Mancha (SESCAM), Spain. We performed the analysis using big data and artificial intelligence via Savana® Manager version 3.0. Results: During the study period, 103 667 patients were diagnosed with and treated for asthma at different care levels. The search was restricted to patients aged 10 to 90 years (mean age, 43.5 [95%CI, 43.4-43.7] years). Of these, 59.8% were women. SCs were taken for treatment of asthma by 58 745 patients t some point during the study period. These patients were older, with a higher prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, obesity, depression, and hiatus hernia. SCs are used frequently in the general population with asthma (31.4% in 2015 and 39.6% in 2019). SCs were prescribed mainly in primary care (59%), allergy (13%), and pulmonology (20%). The frequency of prescription of SCs had a direct impact on the main associated adverse effects. Conclusion: In clinical practice, SCs are frequently prescribed to patients with asthma, especially in primary care. Use of SCs is associated with a greater number of adverse events. It is necessary to implement measures to reduce prescription of SCs to patients with asthma, especially in primary care (AU)


Objetivo: El objetivo del presente estudio fue determinar el uso de corticoides sistémicos (CS) en pacientes con asma bronquial mediante el análisis de big data. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, retrospectivo y no intervencionista basado en datos secundarios capturados a partir de texto libre en las historias clínicas electrónicas. Este estudio se realizó a partir de los datos del Servicio Regional de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha (SESCAM), España. Se realizó el análisis mediante big data e inteligencia artificial a través de Savana® Manager versión 3.0. Resultados: Durante el periodo de estudio, 103 667 pacientes fueron diagnosticados y tratados de asma en los diferentes niveles asistenciales. La búsqueda se restringió a pacientes de entre 10 y 90 años (edad media, 43,5 [IC 95%, 43,4-43,7] años). De ellos, el 59,8% eran mujeres. 58 745 pacientes tomaron SC para el tratamiento del asma en algún momento del periodo de estudio. Estos pacientes eran de mayor edad, con una mayor prevalencia de hipertensión, dislipidemia, diabetes, obesidad, depresión y hernia de hiato. Los SC se utilizan con frecuencia en la población general con asma (31,4% en 2015 y 39,6% en 2019). Los SC se prescribieron principalmente en Atención Primaria (59%), Alergia (13%) y Neumología (20%). La frecuencia de prescripción de SCs tuvo un impacto directo en los principales efectos adversos asociados. Conclusiones: En la práctica clínica, los CS se prescriben con frecuencia a los pacientes con asma, especialmente en Atención Primaria. El uso de los CS se asocia a un mayor número de efectos adversos. Es necesario implementar medidas para reducir la prescripción de CS a los pacientes con asma, especialmente en Atención Primaria (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inteligência Artificial
13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34779775

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present study was to determine the use of systemic corti-costeroids (SCs) in patients with bronchial asthma using big data analysis. METHODS: We performed an observational, retrospective, noninterventional study based on secondary data captured from free text in the electronic health records. This study was per-formed based on data from the regional health service of Castille-La Mancha (SESCAM), Spain. We performed the analysis using big data and artificial intelligence via Savana® Manager version 3.0. RESULTS: During the study period, 103 667 patients were diagnosed with and treated for asthma at different care levels. The search was restricted to patients aged 10 to 90 years (mean age, 43.5 [95%CI, 43.4-43.7] years). Of these, 59.8% were women. SCs were taken for treatment of asthma by 58 745 patients at some point during the study period. These patients were older, with a higher prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, ob-esity, depression, and hiatus hernia. SCs are used frequently in the general population with asthma (31.4% in 2015 and 39.6% in 2019). SCs were prescribed mainly in primary care (59%), allergy (13%) and pulmonology (20%). The frequency of prescription of SCs had a direct impact on the main associated adverse effects. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice, SCs are frequently prescribed to patients with asthma, especially in primary care. Use of SCs is associated with a greater number of adverse events. It is necessary to implement measures to reduce prescription of SCs to patients with asthma, especially in primary care.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...